For teachers

Modern Studies in 36 Stories

Thirty-six true stories, experiments and real-world cases for Modern Studies: how democracy works (and doesn't), who gets heard, why inequality persists, what juries can and can't trust, how media shapes what we believe, and how countries cooperate and clash. Each card takes a minute to read, credits its original source, and comes with a two-minute starter question and a longer discussion prompt. Project them as lesson starters or print a set for group work. Free, no sign-up.

For: National 4/5, Higher and Advanced Higher Modern Studies; also Politics, Sociology and PSHE

All modern studies cards β†’

Democracy and power

Democracy in Scotland and the UK

Iceland ran itself for centuries with no king and no capital

In 930 AD, Iceland's farmer-chieftains gathered at a rift valley called Thingvellir and founded the Althing, an assembly that met once a year to make law and settle feuds -- with no monarch and no standing executive. It's often called the world's oldest parliamentary institution still in existence today.

β€” Jesse Byock, Viking Age Iceland β€” Penguin, 2001

Starter (2 min)
Could a country run without a king, president or prime minister? What would it need instead?
Discuss
The Althing met once a year. How often should citizens get a say: every few years at elections, or more directly?

One French judge's book talked the American founders into splitting power three ways

In The Spirit of the Laws (1748), Montesquieu argued that liberty survives only when legislative, executive, and judicial power sit in separate hands that can check one another, since concentrating all three produces tyranny. He pointed to England's mixed constitution as his working model. His framework went on to shape the US Constitution's system of checks and balances directly.

β€” Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws β€” 1748

Starter (2 min)
Who makes the laws, who carries them out, and who judges them in the UK?
Discuss
How well does the UK separate powers compared with the US? Consider the PM sitting in Parliament and the role of the courts.

Cavalry charged a crowd demanding the right to vote, and killed at least 18

Sixty thousand people gathered peacefully in Manchester in 1819 to demand parliamentary representation. Local magistrates sent armed cavalry into the packed crowd to arrest a speaker, and the resulting crush and sabre charge killed at least 18 people and injured hundreds. The massacre was nicknamed 'Peterloo,' a bitter echo of Waterloo, and became a founding grievance behind Britain's later electoral reforms.

β€” Robert Poole, Peterloo: The English Uprising β€” 2019

Starter (2 min)
In 1819 most people in Manchester had no MP. What would you do if you had no vote?
Discuss
How did events like Peterloo push Britain towards reform? Is peaceful protest always enough to change the law?

Women who chained themselves to railings and starved in prison won the vote

From the 1860s, suffragists petitioned peacefully for decades with little result. In 1903 Emmeline Pankhurst founded the Women's Social and Political Union under the motto 'deeds, not words': members chained themselves to railings, smashed windows and endured forced feeding on hunger strike. British women over 30 won the vote in 1918, full equal suffrage in 1928 β€” the year Pankhurst died.

β€” Diane Atkinson, Rise Up, Women!: The Remarkable Lives of the Suffragettes β€” Bloomsbury, 2018

Starter (2 min)
'Deeds, not words.' When, if ever, is breaking the law justified to win the vote?
Discuss
Did the suffragettes' militant tactics help or hinder the cause? Compare with the peaceful suffragists.

No voting system can turn individual preferences into a fair group choice

Kenneth Arrow proved that no ranked-voting rule can simultaneously satisfy a short list of reasonable fairness conditions once there are three or more options. Every electoral or committee system is a tradeoff, not a solution β€” the theorem launched modern social choice theory and later helped win Arrow a Nobel Prize.

β€” Kenneth Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values β€” 1951; theorem published 1950

Starter (2 min)
Your class votes on a trip with three options. How would you make the result fair?
Discuss
Holyrood uses AMS, Westminster uses First Past the Post. If no system is perfect, which trade-offs matter most?

Staying uninformed before an election can be the economically rational choice

Learning enough to cast a genuinely informed vote takes real effort, but a single vote almost never changes a national election's outcome. Anthony Downs argued that weighing those two facts, it's perfectly rational for a voter to stay deliberately uninformed, since the personal payoff from research is close to zero however the election turns out. The same logic explains why voters often know more about their favourite sports team's roster than their own government's policies.

β€” Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy β€” 1957

Starter (2 min)
How many hours would you spend researching before voting? Be honest.
Discuss
If one vote rarely changes the result, why vote at all? How could turnout among young people in Scotland be increased?

Free at swipesavvy.info/teachers/modern-studies Β· every card credited to its source

Rights, protest and participation

Participation, pressure groups and rights

One refusal to give up a bus seat sparked a 381-day boycott

On 1 December 1955, Rosa Parks was arrested in Montgomery, Alabama for refusing to give up her seat to a white passenger. Local Black leaders, including a young Martin Luther King Jr., organized a boycott of the city's buses that lasted 381 days and ended with a Supreme Court ruling that segregated buses were unconstitutional.

β€” Wikipedia contributors, Montgomery bus boycott β€” 1955–1956

Starter (2 min)
Can one person's refusal change a law? What else had to happen?
Discuss
The boycott lasted 381 days. What makes a campaign succeed: organisation, media attention, the courts, or numbers?

East Londoners barricaded the streets to stop Mosley's fascist march

In October 1936, tens of thousands of Jewish, Irish, and socialist East Enders built barricades and fought police to stop Oswald Mosley's British Union of Fascists marching through Cable Street. The march was called off within hours, and the clash became Britain's defining anti-fascist symbol of the 1930s.

β€” David Rosenberg, Battle for the East End: Jewish Responses to Fascism in the 1930s β€” Five Leaves Publications, 2011

Starter (2 min)
Should a government let a group march if most people strongly oppose it?
Discuss
Where is the line between free speech, the right to protest, and public order? How do UK police balance them today?

A police raid on a Greenwich Village bar sparked the modern LGBTQ rights movement

In the early hours of June 28, 1969, New York police raided the Stonewall Inn, a Greenwich Village gay bar, as they had done many times before. This time patrons fought back, and the street confrontations that followed lasted several nights. The riots galvanized LGBTQ activism in the US, and the first Pride marches, held exactly a year later, trace directly back to that night.

β€” David Carter, Stonewall: The Riots That Sparked the Gay Revolution β€” 2004

Starter (2 min)
Why do you think Pride is held in June?
Discuss
Stonewall began as a riot, not a peaceful protest. How do campaign methods change public opinion over time?

Thoreau spent a night in jail rather than pay for a war he opposed

Henry David Thoreau refused to pay a poll tax funding slavery and the Mexican-American War and spent a night in jail for it. He turned the experience into 'Civil Disobedience,' arguing that when a law forces you to be an agent of injustice, you have a duty to break it -- the essay later shaped Gandhi's and Martin Luther King Jr.'s resistance movements.

β€” Henry David Thoreau, Civil Disobedience (Resistance to Civil Government) β€” essay, 1849

Starter (2 min)
Is it ever right to break a law you think is unjust? Give an example.
Discuss
Thoreau influenced Gandhi and King. Compare civil disobedience with other methods pressure groups use today.

The first major work to argue women's rights are simply human rights

Published in 1792, Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman argued that women only appeared inferior to men because they were denied education, not because of any natural incapacity. She wrote it during the French Revolution, aiming her argument at Enlightenment thinkers who championed liberty for men while ignoring it for women. It's now considered a founding text of Western feminism.

β€” Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman β€” 1792

Starter (2 min)
In 1792, why might people have thought women were less capable than men?
Discuss
Wollstonecraft blamed lack of education. What barriers to equality still exist in Scotland today, and what explains them?

A defense analyst secretly photocopied 7,000 pages and handed them to the press

In 1971, Daniel Ellsberg, a military analyst who had helped write a classified Pentagon history of the Vietnam War, secretly photocopied the entire study and leaked it to the New York Times. The Pentagon Papers showed the government had long misled the public about the war's chances, and the Supreme Court sided with the press when the Nixon administration tried to block publication.

β€” Daniel Ellsberg, Secrets: A Memoir of Vietnam and the Pentagon Papers β€” Viking, 2002

Starter (2 min)
Should a government ever be allowed to stop a newspaper publishing a story?
Discuss
Is leaking secret documents an act of treason or public service? Consider the role of a free press in democracy.

Free at swipesavvy.info/teachers/modern-studies Β· every card credited to its source

Social inequality

Social issues in the UK: inequality

One number, invented in 1912, still measures how unequal a country's income is

Italian statistician Corrado Gini devised a way to compress an entire income distribution into a single score between 0 and 1: 0 means everyone earns the same, 1 means one person earns everything. Plot the gap between a country's actual income distribution and perfect equality, and the Gini coefficient is essentially the size of that gap. It's now the standard yardstick economists use to compare inequality between countries and across time.

β€” Corrado Gini, VariabilitΓ  e mutabilitΓ  β€” 1912

Starter (2 min)
If one person earned everything and everyone else nothing, what would 'fair' look like?
Discuss
The UK's Gini score is higher than many European countries'. What policies might reduce it, and should they?

One formula predicts inequality will keep rising almost automatically: r > g

In Capital in the Twenty-First Century, economist Thomas Piketty compiled centuries of tax records across many countries and argued that whenever the return on capital (r) outpaces overall growth (g), wealth concentrates in the hands of those who already own assets, since their fortunes compound faster than everyone else's wages grow. He argued this has been the historical norm, briefly interrupted only by the wars and taxes of the 20th century. The book became an unlikely bestseller.

β€” Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century β€” 2013

Starter (2 min)
Why might money you already have grow faster than money you earn from a job?
Discuss
Piketty argues wealth taxes could slow inequality. What are the arguments for and against a wealth tax in the UK?

Richer people are happier, but richer countries don't get happier over time

Richard Easterlin found that within any country, wealthier people report more happiness β€” but as whole nations get richer over decades, average happiness barely budges. His explanation: people judge their income against others', so when everyone's income rises together, relative status stays the same.

β€” Richard Easterlin, Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence β€” 1974 essay; named the Easterlin paradox

Starter (2 min)
Would you be happier earning Β£50,000 if everyone else earned Β£100,000?
Discuss
If richer countries don't get happier, should governments measure success by something other than GDP?

A charity is running a 12-year experiment: what happens if you just give people cash?

Since 2016, the nonprofit GiveDirectly has been paying a basic income of about $0.75 a day to tens of thousands of people in rural Kenya, with no conditions on how it's spent, in the largest and longest-running universal basic income study ever run. Early results found recipients invested in businesses and didn't work meaningfully less than a comparison group.

β€” Michael Faye & Paul Niehaus (GiveDirectly), GiveDirectly β€” Kenya UBI study, launched 2016

Starter (2 min)
If you were given money with no conditions, what would you do with it?
Discuss
Scotland has explored universal basic income. Use the Kenyan results to argue for or against a trial here.

An economist built a rival to GDP out of health, schooling and income combined

In 1990, Pakistani economist Mahbub ul Haq, drawing on Amartya Sen's work on human capability, launched the Human Development Index to challenge the idea that a rising GDP alone proves a country is thriving. By blending life expectancy, education and income into one score, it let a poorer country with good healthcare and schools outrank a richer one that neglected both.

β€” Mahbub ul Haq (UNDP), Human Development Report 1990 β€” United Nations Development Programme, 1990

Starter (2 min)
How would you measure whether a country is doing well? List three things.
Discuss
Compare GDP and the HDI as measures of development. What does each leave out?

Children as young as three had already learned to prefer whiteness

Psychologists Kenneth and Mamie Clark showed Black children four dolls, identical except for skin color, and asked which was nice, which was bad, and which they'd like to play with. Most picked the white doll as nicer, showing that racial bias had already taken root before school age. The findings became part of the evidence in the US Supreme Court's 1954 Brown v. Board of Education ruling against school segregation.

β€” Kenneth B. Clark and Mamie Phipps Clark, Racial Identification and Preference in Negro Children β€” Readings in Social Psychology (1947)

Starter (2 min)
At what age do you think children start to notice differences between people?
Discuss
How did psychology evidence help change the law in the US? Can research like this help tackle racial inequality in the UK?

Free at swipesavvy.info/teachers/modern-studies Β· every card credited to its source

Crime and the law

Social issues in the UK: crime and the law

Ask how fast cars were going when they 'smashed', and witnesses invent broken glass

Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer showed people footage of a car accident, then asked how fast the cars were going when they 'smashed', 'collided', 'bumped' or 'hit' each other. The verb alone shifted speed estimates β€” and a week later, people who'd heard 'smashed' were more likely to falsely recall broken glass that was never in the film. Memory isn't a recording; it's rebuilt each time you retrieve it.

β€” Elizabeth Loftus and John Palmer, Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction β€” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974

Starter (2 min)
How fast were the cars going when they 'smashed'? Does the word change your guess?
Discuss
Should eyewitness testimony alone ever be enough to convict someone? How should police word their questions?

Weapon focus: a gun in the room erases the eyewitness's memory of everything else

When a weapon is visible during a crime, eyewitnesses fixate on it and remember far less about everything else, including the perpetrator's face. In a classic 1987 study, Elizabeth Loftus and colleagues showed people a video of a customer handing a cashier either a check or a gun; those who saw the gun stared at it longer and later recognized the person much less accurately. It's a reason courts now treat single-eyewitness identification with caution.

β€” Elizabeth F. Loftus, Geoffrey R. Loftus, and Jane Messo, Some Facts About Weapon Focus β€” Law and Human Behavior, vol. 11, no. 1, 1987

Starter (2 min)
If someone pointed a gun at you, what would you remember afterwards?
Discuss
Scots law has traditionally required corroboration, meaning more than one source of evidence. Why might that matter for eyewitness cases?

You're better at telling faces apart from your own race than others

Across more than a hundred studies, people consistently recognise faces from their own race more accurately than faces from other races, mistaking cross-race strangers for each other far more often. A large meta-analysis confirmed the effect appears worldwide regardless of which race counts as 'own', and it has contributed to real wrongful eyewitness identifications in court.

β€” Christian A. Meissner and John C. Brigham, Thirty Years of Investigating the Own-Race Bias in Memory for Faces: A Meta-Analytic Review β€” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2001

Starter (2 min)
Why might it be harder to tell apart faces of people you rarely meet?
Discuss
What safeguards could reduce wrongful identifications, for example in police line-ups?

A prison tower sees every cell, but no inmate can tell if they're being watched

Bentham designed the Panopticon so a single guard could watch any prisoner at any moment, while prisoners could never confirm whether they were actually being observed. Foucault argued this is the model for modern power generally: once you can never be sure you're unwatched, you start disciplining yourself, and the surveillance no longer needs to be real to work.

β€” Michel Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison β€” 1975

Starter (2 min)
Do you behave differently when you think a camera might be watching?
Discuss
The UK is often called one of the most watched countries in the world. Does surveillance reduce crime, or just change behaviour?

Ordinary people delivered shocks they thought were lethal because a man in a coat said to

In 1961, Stanley Milgram told volunteers to give an unseen 'learner' increasingly severe electric shocks every time he answered wrong. Despite cries of pain from the next room, 65% of participants obeyed all the way to the maximum, seemingly lethal voltage simply because an authority figure calmly told them to continue.

β€” Stanley Milgram, Behavioral Study of Obedience β€” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963

Starter (2 min)
Would you keep going if a scientist told you to? What percentage of people do you think did?
Discuss
What does Milgram suggest about why ordinary people commit crimes when ordered to? Should 'following orders' ever be a defence?

The more people who witness an emergency, the less likely any one of them helps

After the 1964 murder of Kitty Genovese was reported, inaccurately, as having been witnessed by 38 passive neighbours, psychologists John Darley and Bibb LatanΓ© ran experiments showing bystanders are genuinely slower to help when more people are present, each assuming someone else will act or taking cues from others' inaction. The effect has been replicated across dozens of studies with strangers staging fake emergencies.

β€” John M. Darley and Bibb LatanΓ©, Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility β€” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1968

Starter (2 min)
You see someone collapse in a busy street. Do you help straight away? Why or why not?
Discuss
Should there be a legal duty to help someone in danger, as in some countries? What would the arguments be?

Free at swipesavvy.info/teachers/modern-studies Β· every card credited to its source

Media, sources and bias

Using sources: bias, exaggeration and reliability

You don't just believe what confirms your views β€” you go looking for it

Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, favour and recall information that supports what you already believe, while giving less weight to evidence against it. Raymond Nickerson's 1998 review traced it through scientific reasoning, jury verdicts and everyday arguments. It's one of the most consistently replicated biases in psychology.

β€” Raymond S. Nickerson, Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises β€” Review of General Psychology, 1998

Starter (2 min)
When did you last change your mind about something? What made you?
Discuss
How do social media algorithms make confirmation bias worse? What can you do to check your own bias?

The same choice looks different depending on whether it's framed as a gain or a loss

In Tversky and Kahneman's 1981 'Asian disease' experiment, people overwhelmingly picked the safe option when a policy was framed as saving lives, and the risky option when the identical outcome was framed as lives lost. The underlying numbers never changed, only the wording. It became one of the founding demonstrations behind prospect theory.

β€” Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice β€” Science, 1981

Starter (2 min)
'90% survival rate' or '10% death rate': which sounds better, and why?
Discuss
Find a political headline or slogan that uses framing. How could the same facts be framed the opposite way?

A New York newspaper convinced readers the Moon had bat-winged people on it

In August 1835 the New York Sun ran a six-part series claiming astronomer John Herschel had spotted unicorns, blue goats and bat-winged humanoids on the Moon through a giant new telescope. Circulation exploded and rival papers reprinted it as fact before the Sun let the story quietly die without ever really retracting it.

β€” Richard Adams Locke, The Moon Hoax β€” New York Sun, August 1835

Starter (2 min)
Why might a newspaper print a story it knows isn't true?
Discuss
Compare the Moon Hoax to modern fake news. What has changed about how false stories spread, and what hasn't?

The 1938 'Martian invasion' panic was mostly a newspaper invention

Orson Welles's radio adaptation of The War of the Worlds is remembered for sending America into mass hysteria. In reality, ratings suggest almost no one was tuned to that station, and modern research found only scattered, anecdotal reports of fright. Newspapers β€” uneasy about radio stealing their advertising β€” ran wire reports that inflated a minor stir into a legendary nationwide panic.

β€” Jefferson Pooley and Michael Socolow, The Myth of the War of the Worlds Panic β€” Slate, 2013

Starter (2 min)
Have you ever heard a 'panic' story that turned out to be exaggerated?
Discuss
Newspapers had a motive to exaggerate radio's dangers. How can you spot when a source has a reason to exaggerate?

A single radio station coached ordinary Rwandans, day by day, on who to kill next

In 1994, the station RTLM broadcast the names, addresses and hiding places of targets over the air, calling Tutsi 'cockroaches' and telling listeners not to spare women or children. Roughly 500,000 to 800,000 people were killed in about 100 days, one of the fastest mass killings in recorded history. An international tribunal later convicted RTLM's founders of genocide for the broadcasts themselves.

β€” Philip Gourevitch, We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed With Our Families β€” Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1998

Starter (2 min)
How much power can one media outlet have over what people believe?
Discuss
The station's founders were convicted for broadcasts alone. Where should the line between free speech and incitement be drawn?

One third of people will agree with an answer they can see is wrong

Solomon Asch asked participants to match line lengths β€” an unambiguous, easy task. But when several actors in the room confidently gave the same wrong answer first, real participants conformed to it about a third of the time on average, and three in four conformed at least once across the trials. Correcting your own eyes felt riskier than looking foolish alone.

β€” Solomon Asch, Asch conformity experiments β€” Swarthmore College study, 1951

Starter (2 min)
Would you give an answer you knew was wrong to fit in with the group?
Discuss
How might conformity affect voting, protest or online pile-ons? When does peer pressure become a threat to democracy?

Free at swipesavvy.info/teachers/modern-studies Β· every card credited to its source

International relations

International issues: world powers and world issues

Three leaders sketched the shape of the postwar world while one of them was dying

In February 1945, with Germany's defeat only months away, Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, and Joseph Stalin met at Yalta in Crimea to decide how occupied Europe would be governed, and to secure Soviet entry into the war against Japan. Roosevelt, visibly exhausted and only weeks from his own death, pushed hard for Stalin's support of the new United Nations. The compromises reached there, especially over Poland's borders, shaped the Cold War's dividing lines for decades.

β€” Protocol of Proceedings, Crimean Conference, Yalta Conference β€” 4-11 February 1945

Starter (2 min)
Three leaders decided the future of millions. Who wasn't in the room?
Discuss
How did decisions at Yalta shape the Cold War and the United Nations? Should big powers decide for smaller countries?

America rebuilt the economies of the countries it had just defeated

In 1948, facing a Europe devastated by war and at risk of turning to communism, the US launched the Marshall Plan, sending over $13 billion to rebuild Western European economies, including those of former enemies Germany and Italy. Recipients had to cooperate on joint economic planning, laying groundwork for European integration. It is widely credited with Europe's rapid postwar recovery, though historians still debate how decisive it really was.

β€” Benn Steil, The Marshall Plan: Dawn of the Cold War β€” 2018

Starter (2 min)
Why would a country spend billions rebuilding its former enemies?
Discuss
Was the Marshall Plan generosity or self-interest? Compare it with how international aid works today.

One country has its own currency, army, and elections but no seat at the UN

Somaliland declared independence from Somalia in 1991 and has since run its own government, printed its own money, and held multiple peaceful elections. Not a single UN member state formally recognizes it, so on most world maps it simply doesn't exist as a country.

β€” Wikipedia contributors, Somaliland β€” Wikipedia

Starter (2 min)
What makes a country a country? List three things it needs.
Discuss
Somaliland holds elections but isn't recognised. Should the UN recognise it? Compare with Scotland's independence debate.

Britain and Iceland fought three 'wars' over fish, almost bloodlessly

Between 1958 and 1976, the UK and Iceland repeatedly clashed over fishing rights in the North Atlantic, deploying warships and trawlers that rammed each other and cut fishing nets. Despite the name, the Cod Wars produced no direct combat deaths before Iceland won expanded fishing limits. NATO reportedly pressured Britain to back down, worried Iceland might otherwise leave the alliance.

β€” Wikipedia contributors, Cod Wars β€” Anglo-Icelandic fishing disputes, 1958-1976

Starter (2 min)
A small country took on Britain's navy and won. How could that happen?
Discuss
How did NATO membership give Iceland power over the UK? What does this show about alliances and influence?

Cold War rivals docked their spacecraft together and shook hands in orbit

On July 17, 1975, an American Apollo capsule and a Soviet Soyuz capsule docked 222 km above Earth, and astronaut Thomas Stafford and cosmonaut Alexei Leonov shook hands through the open hatch β€” the first handshake between the two nations' astronauts in space. For two days the crews shared meals, ran joint experiments and held press conferences together. It was the last flight of an Apollo spacecraft, and a symbolic thaw in the Cold War space race.

β€” NASA, Soviet space program, Apollo-Soyuz Test Project β€” July 1975

Starter (2 min)
Can rival countries cooperate while still competing? Give a modern example.
Discuss
How can symbolic gestures like Apollo-Soyuz ease tensions between world powers? Do they make a real difference?

125,000 refugees flooded Miami's job market. Wages barely moved.

When Fidel Castro let 125,000 Cubans leave for Miami in 1980, the city's labor force grew roughly 7% within months, a textbook shock to labor supply. Economist David Card compared Miami's wages and unemployment to similar cities and found almost no effect on native workers, even the least skilled. It became a landmark natural experiment on whether immigration hurts wages.

β€” David Card, The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market β€” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 43, No. 2, January 1990

Starter (2 min)
If a town's population grew 7% overnight, what would you expect to happen to jobs?
Discuss
Use the Mariel evidence to evaluate claims about immigration and wages. Why do people still believe migrants lower wages?

Free at swipesavvy.info/teachers/modern-studies Β· every card credited to its source

Presenting: click or press β†’ to advance, ← to go back, Esc to exit. Each card shows the starter, then the story, then the discussion prompt.

Using these with a class? We'd love to hear how it went, and which topics you'd like next.

Five ideas worth knowing, every week

The week's best cards and a puzzle, credited as always. Free, unsubscribe any time.