James said it's rational to believe ahead of the evidence — sometimes

When a choice is forced, can't be settled by evidence either way, and matters enough that waiting is itself a choice, James argued you're entitled to let your passional nature decide. He aimed this squarely at religious belief: refusing to believe until proof arrives is itself a bet, not neutrality.

— William James, The Will to Believe — 1896 essay
Go deeper: get the book →